Comments

    4 Responses to “ Arsenal Legend Henry Acted Instinctively and is Still True Gent”

  • B T Moler

    November 20th, 2009 9:43 pm

    I’m getting tired of people making excuses for Henry. You say that you believe that “the man acted on pure instinct”.

    How can that be when he touched the ball not once, but twice? Surely reasoning and fair play should kick in after the first time if he was a true gentleman as you say.

    “It was just neccesary to exploit what was exploitable.” – That’s what Henry reportedly said in his Twitter account. Sounds VERY deliberate to me, don’t you think!!!

  • Michael

    November 20th, 2009 9:51 pm

    If before the game you had gone to Thierry Henry and told him that France would qualify for the World Cup but that he’d use his hands to setup the winning goal and that his reputation would forever be tarnished, he wouldn’t do it. It was just instinct and as he did it I’m sure he expected the referee’s whistle to blow at any moment. Unfortunately, it never did.

  • tom

    November 21st, 2009 1:43 am

    no no not instinct, hand ball twice and then run away like a thief that he undoubtely is and lets not forgrt about the offside, i only believe what i see with my eyes, twist the facts whatever way you want too so too justify a twisted mind and undoubted bitterness.have a happy life my friend

  • Mick

    November 21st, 2009 7:29 pm

    Hi Jamie,

    your final sentence sums it up. If FIFA take no action after this event then the writing is on the wall as to where their priorities are. Money first, sport, fair play and fans second.

    I still have the question in my mind – ‘what if this had been the world cup final?’ Do you think we’d have the same FIFA stance – no replay?

    Be interesting to see if they implement video for the competition.

Leave a

Reply

  • Name *

  • Mail *(will not be published)

  • Website

  • Comment

Arsenal Legend Henry Acted Instinctively and is Still True Gent

 

 

Jamie Butcher

 

Not since 22nd June, 1986 in Mexico City has the football world erupted as it has done this week. Not since Diego Armando Maradona punched the ball over Peter Shilton in the quarter-final of the World Cup to send England crashing out of the tournament has the subject of ‘cheating’ been brought so much into the public spotlight.

On Wednesday night Thierry Henry, the former Arsenal legend and current Barcelona man, handled the ball in extra-time of France’s World Cup playoff with Ireland to set up William Gallas, who headed home to put the French 2-1 ahead on aggregate and end the Irish’s World Cup dream.

I watched the game at a bar which had a decent amount of both French and Irish supporters, but the majority of people were English hoping to see a passionate encounter, and they weren’t disappointed. As Gallas’s header hit the back of the net the French fans went crazy… seconds later as the replay showed Henry’s handball the whole bar erupted into an almost deafening chorus of boos. The French fans even looked embarrassed.

Let’s get things into perspective, realistically either side could have won on the night – the Irish had chances to win the game in the home and away leg but didn’t take them and there’s no guarantee that if the match had gone to penalties that France wouldn’t have won 5-0 anyway.

The Irish FA officially sent a letter to FIFA asking for the match to be replayed which was rejected. In truth, if FIFA sanctioned the replay then there would have been uproar from managers about losing their players for another draining game at a crucial time of the season. Scheduling a replay would have been a logistical nightmare with the World Cup draw less than two weeks away and no further international breaks this year.

The next factor that has been brought up is Thierry Henry – did he cheat? Well, the laws of the game say he did cheat – he handled the ball and kept it in play. However, the difference is in the question. Thierry Henry did cheat, but he isn’t a cheat. He’s a gentleman of the game and one of few left. I truly believe that although the act itself was awful, that the man was acting on pure instinct. If anyone had been in that situation with a split-second to think, would you have done the same? Bearing in mind that your actions in that split-second could decide whether you were under the global spotlight in the biggest football tournament in the world or watching it at home.

If Henry had been caught, the worst the Frenchman could have received was a yellow card for intentional handball. The reaction by the Arsenal legend after the game, in my opinion, summed up his feelings on the night. I know he was criticised for celebrating the goal but again, I think that goes down to instinct. At the full-time whistle, Henry wasn’t celebrating in front of the French fans or running round hugging team mates, he was sitting on the grass with Ireland captain Richard Dunne where he openly admitted to him that he’d handled the ball in the build up to the goal.

The question now is whether Henry’s reputation will stay intact after this storm blows over? I think he’ll be remembered as the classy, respectable player who gave the Premier League some of its most exciting moments ever. That’s how he deserves to be remembered.

I don’t want this to sound as though I’m excusing Henry for what he did as I’m not but I do understand why he did it. At the same time I also feel heartbroken for the Irish fans and players. It may well have been Robbie Keane’s, Richard Dunne’s or Damien Duff’s (amongst others) last chance to play at a World Cup and it was stolen from them which isn’t fair. Which moves me onto the next point of who is to blame?

The answer is a difficult one, the referee obviously didn’t see it, the linesman obviously didn’t see it either, but surely anyone with any sense could tell from five or six Irish players reactions and protests that there must have been something in the claim. To not even consult the linesman is a difficult thing to understand.

Once again, we have been brought back full circle to the claim; no scratch that, plea for video technology to be used in football. Why can’t there be a system where each team has one or two appeals per game to challenge a referee’s decision if they believe that it’s wrong? The captain alone could have the responsibility of asking for the appeal. The game would be stopped for no longer than 30 seconds while a fourth official reviewed the tape and travesties such as what happened Wednesday night wouldn’t happen again.

As well as footballing implications there are also financial implications to consider – it’s been estimated that the loss of the playoff has cost the Irish FA £1M, while the French will see a boost to their national economy of around £1 billion. Should the French economy get a boost that large by cheating? It doesn’t set a good example to anyone, whether that’s current professionals or the new generation coming through. We need to make it clear that cheating won’t be tolerated in the beautiful game to maintain its integrity and its romance.

Let’s hope that we can get something positive from this situation and that FIFA will finally relent on their disagreement with video technology.


  Latest Features:

 

Inside Futbol - Twitter