XRegister
* Fields need to be completed
Account Details
Username * :
Password * :
Confirm Password * :
Email Address * :
Confirm Email Address * :
   
Please type the letters &
numbers in the box below
CAPTCHA Image
Reload image
Personal Details
First Name * :
Last Name * :
Country * :
Date of Birth * : Select date
Favourite Team :
 
I have read and accept the Terms & Conditions.
I have read and accept the Privacy Policy.
Send me occasional Inside Futbol updates.
  |   Forgot Password?
XPlease log in...
Username :
Password :
 
...or sign in with your Facebook account
Connect with Facebook
Register   |   Forgot Password?
XEnter your email...
Email address:
 
Register
X
Connect with Facebook
Inside Futbol
Get Inside Futbol via Email
Preview Delivered by FeedBurner

07 August 2010

Real Madrid-Barcelona Quiz!
How much do you really know about Spain's biggest clubs? Try the Inside Futbol Quiz on the homepage and find out!

 

Scroll
AustraliaChinaJapanQatarSaudi ArabiaBulgariaCzech RepublicPolandRomaniaSerbiaUkraineEnglandGermanyItalyUSARussiaArgentinaBrazilSpainAustriaBelgiumFranceGreeceHollandIsraelPortugalScotlandSwitzerlandTurkey
Scroll

England

Blatter Right to Hammer Chelsea over Kakuta

Print for later?

 


Phillip Buckley


FIFA’s decision to ban Chelsea from transfer activity for 12 months for their signing of French youngster Gael Kakuta should be welcomed, at least for the fact it sends a message that no matter how rich a club is, or how illustrious its history, the rules of the game must be obeyed. Make no mistake, Sepp Blatter has acted in perhaps the strongest possible way: A transfer ban is infinitely more unpalatable at Stamford Bridge than a fine which owner Roman Abramovich could pay off from the loose change in his pocket.

The player who the entire situation revolves around, Gael Kakuta, got the football bug at the age of seven and impressed almost from the off. Lens were happy to have such a highly regarded youngster, and his youth coach at the French club Joachim Marx knew the talent he had on his hands."The easiest way to describe him is a phenomenon," said Marx. Why Chelsea should want Kakuta is clear, but it is also clear they broke the rules to get the player. Perhaps the "phenomenon" was just too tempting.

The rule book is there for a reason, in fact, for some, most notably UEFA president Michel Platini, it still doesn’t go far enough, particularly with regard to the movement of young players. But in this case Kakuta’s age has nothing to do with why Chelsea have been sanctioned. What the Stamford Bridge club have been found to have done is to induce Kokuta to break an existing contract with Lens. Chelsea will have known the letter of the law and the penalty they would be likely to incur by signing the French youngster: It is spelt out in black and white in the FIFA rulebook. "It shall be presumed unless established to the contrary, that any club signing a professional who has terminated his contract without just cause has induced that professional to commit a breach. The club shall be banned from registering any new players, either nationally or internationally, for two registration periods".

Chelsea are not the first club to be penalised for inducing a player to break his contract, and in a cut throat football world where even 10-year-olds are courted by a stream of top clubs are unlikely to be the last. In 2005, Italian giants Roma faced the same punishment for their signing of defender Philippe Mexes. The Serie A club took their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (as Chelsea are expected to do) and had their transfer ban cut to a single window. Swiss side Sion are in the process of appealing against, as Chelsea, a 12 month transfer ban. Their case is waiting to be resolved, and as it is their ban has been frozen.

What Chelsea will and should pay for is encouraging Kakuta to break his contract. Kakuta signed the deal willingly and then walked away. This is reflected in the financial part of the penalty, as of the €780,000 fine dished out by FIFA, only €130,000 of it will be paid by Chelsea.

Given Kakuta’s age upon moving to Chelsea it is not surprising this aspect of the case has garnered attention. Yet this is very different from well known examples of youngsters seeking riches elsewhere that they are not yet entitled to in their homeland, the most famous of which are probably Cesc Fabregas and Federico Macheda. Both Fabregas and Macheda were unable to sign a professional contract in Spain or Italy before turning 18. In England the threshold is just 17, but in France, Kakuta’s birthplace, the age is even lower, at 16.

Despite the lower age limit in France, it is French clubs reduced financial means that encourage predators from richer leagues to comb the country. It seems that Qatari scouts in particular have taken up residence in Paris, much to chagrin of the French Football Association.

There is no doubt the age of players moving from country to country should be looked at, and Platini seems keen to take some sort of action, recently commenting, "It is necessary to make rules in the transfer market of young players. I say this not because of Chelsea or another team is involved, but the illegal traffic of young players has to be stopped".

With the relationship between FIFA and UEFA at its warmest for decades, there is a real chance of co-ordinated action from the two organisations. Under the previous leadership of Lennart Johansson, any move made by Sepp Blatter would be treated with suspicion, the atmosphere between the two remaining frosty following Johansson’s lost bid against Blatter for the FIFA presidency. But Platini and Blatter are close friends and both yearn to clip the wings of club sides that have, in their view, grown too powerful.

FIFA and UEFA though must tread carefully. Recently there has been talk of banning young players from moving between clubs until they are at least 18. This would be foolish, not to mention opposed strongly by the EU as a restraint of trade. It is essential a player retains the right to play where he wishes, though at the same time it is a laudable goal to prevent European giants cherry-picking youngsters from across the globe. Much the better course of action would be, with agreement from all federations within Europe, to prevent any player under 18 from leaving one federation’s jurisdiction and entering another’s. Whilst this would not solve the problem of larger clubs raiding smaller ones (nothing can ever do that, or should, it is the natural order of the game) it would allow the clubs of the country which has raised the player to get some benefit from them, whether it be on pitch, or from a transfer fee.

FIFA have been right to take action against Chelsea. In this case the Stamford Bridge club appear to have acted without any regard for the rules of the game. Even if their penalty will probably be reduced on appeal FIFA’s move is still a powerful warning shot across Roman Abramovich’s latest luxury yacht. A strong and powerful FIFA and UEFA is what every fan should want, lest the future of the game be decided by the faceless accountants and business development directors staffing Europe’s giants.


Latest Articles:

COMMENTS:

4 Responses to “Blatter Right to Hammer Chelsea over Kakuta”

  1. FCT says:

    Phillip : A couple of very important things you fail to mention regarding this case. Kakuta was not signed to a professional contact unlike the Roma and Sion cases, He had signed an agrrement that meant he had to sign for Lens when he came of age. This in itself is a clear “restriction of trade” under eu Employment laws not to mention the validity of a minor signing such an agreement.
    It may well be imoral to poach such teenagers from other clubs but under current laws it isn’t ilegal which is why Chelsea will go to the CAS and argue the case. And why Chelsea and why now?

    Most of the big clubs in Europe have been doing the same thing for years, Why for instance have Platini’s darlings Barca not been charged in the past or Real,Liverpool,Man United or the worst of the lot for this sort of thing Arsenal?

    The real truth is FIFA and UEFA despise Abramovich’s wealth and power in the mordern game as seen by the amount of sanctions laid againt the club in the past 5 years when other similar incidents by the old G14 clubs have gone unpunished.

  2. Sir Cecil says:

    The farce is that Lens could not legally offer Kakuta a contract at that age. So they circiumvent the law by offering a “pre-contract”. It is Lens that is the predator of young players. It is tantamount to telling a student he shall NOT be able to go to Oxford or Cambridge or Harvard even if he is offered a place – he must stay where he is, even if it is an inferior Academy. Why? Because he was induced by LENS to sign a piece of paper while underage.
    Phillip Buckley clearly thinks a young student should give up his rights to the education of his choosing, because some scavengers latched on to him at Primary School age. It is LENS who are the traffickers here and mealy-mouthed words from Blatter, Platini or Buckley about rich clubs being to blame is a lot of rubbish. In fact, they put the well-being of a club like Lens above the well-being and freedom of choice of a young man to shape his future.
    Disgusting.

  3. Paul Teta says:

    @FCT

    It does not matter whether it was a professional contract or not. Kakuta is being done for breach of contract. Unless of course you don’t see a pre-contract as a contract? FIFA obviously do and it has been broken.

    Chelsea knew he had signed this when they signed him themselves. They were just so arragant not to care. Now they care.

  4. FCT says:

    Paul: FIFA have trouble with these pre contracts and admit they are worried they may not be legal under European law. They gave a rulling in an almost identical case in 2004 where they ruled that such a pre contract could not be inforced. Strange they now choose to go against a previous judgement, Which is why Chelsea have rightly pointed out the judgement in this case is without presidents !

    The idea of a minor signing a pre contract which restricts not only his rights of trade when he comes of legal working age but also his restrictment of movement to another country breaks just about every EU employment and civil rights law out there. Infact I fully expect these pre contract agreements to be outlawed in the game as a result of the CAS hearing !

Leave a Reply

Published: Monday, 7th Sep 2009

Follow insidefutbol on Twitter